Comments on: Things I Can’t Bring Myself to Care About http://moderateleft.com/?p=5333 Blogging at its worst! Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:20:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: nobody.really http://moderateleft.com/?p=5333&cpage=1#comment-267536 nobody.really Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:13:51 +0000 http://moderateleft.com/?p=5333#comment-267536 <blockquote>*He won’t run for a third term, but it’s a possibility until he rules it out.</blockquote> Fecke called it on March 30! But can he call the next governor's race? Quiet, now; he's setting up the shot. Here he goes! It's....

*He won’t run for a third term, but it’s a possibility until he rules it out.

Fecke called it on March 30!

But can he call the next governor’s race? Quiet, now; he’s setting up the shot. Here he goes! It’s….

]]> By: Sherry http://moderateleft.com/?p=5333&cpage=1#comment-264425 Sherry Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:09:58 +0000 http://moderateleft.com/?p=5333#comment-264425 I think your word "plurality" sums it up. In a plural system, Pawlenty loses. However, if he, his party or anyone can convince a moderate third party person to run in the election, the democratic vote is split and he wins. That is the only way he has won so far. No majority support. Split the vote and he doesn't have to run on his record. He's just not "them". Oh yeah, he gets it. And you know what we get. I think your word “plurality” sums it up. In a plural system, Pawlenty loses. However, if he, his party or anyone can convince a moderate third party person to run in the election, the democratic vote is split and he wins. That is the only way he has won so far. No majority support. Split the vote and he doesn’t have to run on his record. He’s just not “them”. Oh yeah, he gets it. And you know what we get.

]]>